Re: [patch 2/8] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : Debug messages added

[Robert Richter]

On 20.06.07 13:22:16, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> David,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:49:05PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Robert Richter wrote:
> > 
> > > Debug messages added for better debugging.
> > > 
> > 
> > And you added BUG_ON()'s.
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/perfmon/perfmon_file.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc3.orig/perfmon/perfmon_file.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc3/perfmon/perfmon_file.c
> > > @@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ static int pfm_mmap(struct file *file, s
> > >  	unsigned long flags;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >  
> > > +	PFM_DBG("pfm_file_ops");
> > 
> > After commenting on your first set of patches, I've been using it a little 
> > more.  In my use, these debugging messages weren't very helpful because 
> > "pfm_file_ops" can indicate pfm_mmap, pfm_read, pfm_poll, etc.  Could 
> > these be changed to be more specific based on the function they're in?
> > 
> the PFM_DBG() macro adds the CPU, function name and line number to the
> printed string.

Right, I had this in mind.

-Robert

-- 
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@xxxxxxx



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/