Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 19, 2007, david@xxxxxxx wrote:

> if a company doesn't care about tivoizing then they won't do it, it
> takes time and money to tivoize some product and it will cause
> headaches for the company.

> their reasons for wanting to tivoize a product may be faulty, but they
> think that the reasons are valid or they wouldn't go to the effort.

Absolutely right.  And we'll get to that.  Please just be patient.

In fact, how much the company cares about tivoizing is completely
irrelevant to that point.  I shouldn't even have included it, but I
did because I thought it would be useful as a boundary condition.

So just disregard that.

Is there agreement that, comparing tivoized and non-tivoized hardware,
we get'd more contributions if the hardware is not tivoized, because
users can scratch their own itches, than we would for tivoized
hardware?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/