Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages

[holzheu]

On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 18:36 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 15:53 +0200, holzheu wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 06:12 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 14:55 +0200, holzheu wrote:
> > > > Hi Gerrit,
> > > > 
> > > > The common thing of your and our approach is, that we need an ID to
> > > > identify a message either by:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Maybe I am missing something big, but why is an ID needed?
> > > The message IS the ID right? That's the only thing that is robust
> > > against code moving about....
> > 
> > Yes. As already discussed with Pavel, it is one option to use the format
> > string of the message as message ID. The disadvantage compared to
> > message IDs like hashes is, that format strings might be even less
> > unique than hashes 
> 
> if the hash comes from the string in the first place I have a hard time
> believing that.
> 

Just think of all messages containing %s, which can expand to every
possible string.

Michael

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/