Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
From: Sanjoy Mahajan
Date: Fri Jun 15 2007 - 23:35:50 EST
>> "version 2 or higher"
> That phrase exists outside the license
That's true. But sec. 9 of the GPLv2 says:
If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you
may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation.
So, by making the COPYING contain the v2 text, is the author
specifying a particular version? If yes, then the sec. 9 provision
would be meaningless, since there would be no way to not specify a
My understanding is that courts would presume that a license term has
a meaning, if it has a plausible reading. And there such a reading:
that to specify a version, there needs to be (e.g. in the source
files) a statement like, "This file [or work] is licensed under the
Corrections, flames, etc. are welcome.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/