Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainlineplans)

From: Miguel Figueiredo
Date: Fri Jun 15 2007 - 17:20:22 EST

Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 schrieb Miguel Figueiredo:
>> Hi all,
>> some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found on
> Hi Miquel, Ingo, Con!

> Any suggestions?

I read somewhere in the list that X itself makes lots of hocus pocus
that affect the behavior of programs running inside X itself (i even
read about X's own scheduling - someone can confirm/deny it? - and evil
behavior on drivers).

If we look/test a fair/responsive scheduler isn't better to test it
outside X?
IMHO, X itself, it's too complex and may obscure our tests on

Anyone knows any good tests for interctivity?



Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at