Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions with patches v3

From: Alan Stern
Date: Wed Jun 13 2007 - 17:02:26 EST


On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > USB
> >
> > Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but
> > was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
> > Submitter : Paulo Pereira <pfmp.404@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
> > Status : patch was suggested
>
> I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and
> that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?

I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch
should have fixed it. But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our
queries, we can't be certain.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/