Re: fix placement of inline keyword.
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Tue Jun 12 2007 - 19:38:42 EST
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:30:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> gcc gets whiney about the placement of 'inline' at some warning levels.
Since most of them are in C files, can you remove these when you are at it?
> --- linux-2.6.20.noarch/arch/ia64/sn/pci/pcibr/pcibr_ate.c~ 2007-04-04 19:34:50.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.20.noarch/arch/ia64/sn/pci/pcibr/pcibr_ate.c 2007-04-04 19:34:56.000000000 -0400
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline u64 __iomem *pcibr_ate_add
> * Update the ate.
> -void inline
> +inline void
> ate_write(struct pcibus_info *pcibus_info, int ate_index, int count,
> volatile u64 ate)
And some are even non-static inline functions...
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/