Re: [PATCH RFC] struct list_node
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Sun Jun 10 2007 - 16:20:01 EST
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The Linux kernel list.h is _better_ than most stupid list implementations
> that think that a head node is different from the list node. Exactly
> because it very naturally supports the notion of "this structure exists in
> a 'ring of entries'" where each node is 100% equivalent to any other node,
> and there _is_ no head.
Btw, to extend a bit on this: there actually *is* a "list with a head"
implementation in <linux/list.h>, called "hlist".
Now, the "h" actually historically stands for "hash", but if you prefer,
you can think of it as standing for "head", and be happy.
And if you want a head, you really do want to use "hlist", since the head
is smaller than a list entry (a single pointer rather than two).
And yes, I'm sure we could change some "struct list" users to "struct
hlist" if you wanted to.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/