Re: [patch-mm 06/23] clockevents: Fix resume logic
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun Jun 10 2007 - 12:28:40 EST
On Sunday, 10 June 2007 15:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 12:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This is the resume part, or at least it seems so, but the above one is a
> > suspend callback. If I understand it correctly, this one replaces
> > hpet_resume(), but is it sufficient for the suspend part too?
> Oops. Sorry, misunderstood you. Yeah, it's intentional. It gets reset on
> power off and we have not seen any problems with this yet.
OK, I wouldn't do it in this patch, though.
IMO it's a bit more than the changelog says and we'll lose the track record of
this change if it goes like this. Would that be possible to separate it?
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/