Re: 2.6.21 numa policy and huge pages not working

From: William Lee Irwin III
Date: Sun Jun 10 2007 - 00:51:06 EST

On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:10:51PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> ok i've narrowed it some... maybe.
> in commit 8ef8286689c6b5bc76212437b85bdd2ba749ee44 things work fine, numa
> policy is respected...
> the very next commit bc56bba8f31bd99f350a5ebfd43d50f411b620c7 breaks shm
> badly causing the test program to oops the kernel.
> commit 516dffdcd8827a40532798602830dfcfc672294c fixes that breakage but
> numa policy is no longer respected.
> i've added the authors of those two commits to the recipient list and
> reattached the test program. hopefully someone can shed light on the
> problem.

Thanks, this helps a lot.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at