Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 23:01:15 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >     
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc3/2.6.22-rc3-mm1/
> > >
> > > - Merged the convert-cpusets-to-container-infrastructure patches.  These
> > >   will probably be dropped and redone.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > >       
> > <BIG SNIP>
> >     
> > >  x86 things
> > >
> > > +add-select-phylib-to-the-ucc_geth-kconfig-option.patch
> > > +m68k-parenthesis-balance.patch
> > > +msi-fix-the-ordering-of-msix-irqs.patch
> > > +msi-mask-the-msix-vector-before-we-unmap-it.patch
> > > +potential-parse-error-in-ifdef.patch
> > > +potential-parse-error-in-ifdef-fix.patch
> > > +potential-parse-error-in-ifdef-update.patch
> > > +pci_ids-update-patch-for-intel-ich9m.patch
> > > +x86-fix-oprofile-double-free-was-re-multiple-free.patch
> > >   
> > >       
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/565 fixes the above patch :-)
> >
> >     
>
> I don't know what you mean.  The code is already using
> for_each_possible_cpu() and
> x86-fix-oprofile-double-free-was-re-multiple-free.patch doesn't change
> that.
>
>   
Yes, the code, i.e. nmi_setup already uses for_each_possible_cpu(), that 
is not the problem. The problem is allocate_msr doing a 
for_each_online_cpu(), i.e. not allocating for each_possible_cpu. Chris 
tested and acked the patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/31/36

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/