Re: Compact Flash performance...

[Robert Hancock]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
> > To maximize throughput, some kind of host-queuing would be needed,
> > or just have the driver sit in a tight loop, starting the next I/O
> > immediately when the previous one finishes.  Linux isn't that quick 
> > (yet).
>
>
> I was talking on IRC with Tejun just recently.  There are several 
> controllers (and/or "situations") like this, where some amount of host 
> queueing would permit greater throughput, even when NCQ is not 
> supported.  sata_sx4 is the most dramatic example, where host queueing 
> could potentially increase speed by a factor of 10 or more, since it is 
> penalized by an awful two-irq-per-command (w/ a per-host bottleneck to 
> boot) setup.  Silicon Image has a "command buffer".  And overall, I 
> designed ->qc_prep() hook separate from ->qc_issue() to enable the 
> prepartion of multiple commands such that it only takes a simple "go" 
> I/O to start a transaction, immediately after the previous one ends.
>
>     Jeff

Theoretically NVIDIA nForce4 ADMA could likely do this as well, as it 
seems to allow chaining up multiple commands to execute in succession 
(assuming they're not NCQ)..

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/