Re: [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 31 May 2007 05:56:33 -0600 ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> >> I suspect that is a pretty rare case but it does indeed seem to exist
> >> as a problem.
> >
> > I think so too. But either we have some misunderstanding of the
> > codepaths involved, or the author of the comments there didn't
> > consider this case, so...
> 
> Do someone needs to stand up and write the additional patches.
> Do we have a maintainer for fs/buffer.c?

me, if any one, I guess.  But I haven't really been following
this discussion - too long and slow ;)  'twould be good if you
could reprise it all in one email, presumably in diff -u form..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/