Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Wed May 30 2007 - 20:11:13 EST


On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:01:34 -0400 Dave Jones wrote:

> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 04:32:54PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
> Hi Nigel,
>
> > As promised I took another look at the patch and at what Randy had
> > prepared to fix the IA64 compilation error. I did some more work on it,
> > and believe that the following is the tidiest correct solution I can
> > come up with. It differs from the version that caused the compilation
> > error primarily in that:
> >
> > * the #include <asm/resume-trace.h> is inside the #ifdef
> > CONFIG_PM_TRACE.
> > * now-unnecessary protection for multiple #includes and ifdef testing of
> > CONFIG_PM_TRACE in the asm code were removed.
> > * do-nothing definitions for !PM_TRACE restored to
> > include/linux/resume-trace.h.
> >
> > We're therefore depending upon kernel/power/Kconfig having the right
> > depends condition. As far as I can see, IA64 doesn't define CONFIG_X86.
> > Is that correct, or do we need to have (X86 && !IA64)?
>
> Can you post a copy of this that isn't mangled by quoted-printable encoding?
> Whilst it looks fine in my MUA, the diff ends up looking like..

yep :(

http://www.xenotime.net/linux/patches/x8664-pm-trace-support.patch

in case Nigel is asleep.


> I'm beginning to think we really need a Documentation/Unhorking-MUAs-HOWTO
> judging by the amount of broken encodings we seem to get to lkml these days.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/