RE: kexec and aacraid broken

From: Salyzyn, Mark
Date: Wed May 30 2007 - 10:32:34 EST


Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx] writes:
> So most likely if we start disabling the interrupts
> in .shutdown routine we might skip resetting adapter
> on every kexec without any side affects?

Not that simple. The .shutdown would need to perform more resource
cleanups of the .remove call to prevent side effects. I need to move
some of the .remove activity into the .shutdown handler to make sure the
adapter is quiesced.

I will hold off on submitting any of these changes until they are
evaluated and tested; I am waiting for feedback from Yinghai on the
other mitigations that I feel are closer to the root cause.

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/