Re: [PATCH 3/3] Make ide dma blacklist handling a bit saner.

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

Hi,

On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Earlier, the matching of (model,rev) in ide-dma black/white list
> handling was to consider "ALL" in the table to match any
> revision.  This changes the wildcard to NULL.  This way, the
> DMA_BLACK_LIST macro used in the previous patch does not have to
> use a slightly funky compile time constant expression to convert
> NULL to "ALL".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx>

The change itself looks good but IMO it is worth doing it before patch #2/3
(it would also make it possible for me to merge this patch immediately).

When it comes to patch #2 - Alan's comment may be a bit harsh but he seems
to be right - there should be a common library-like file (ata-blacklist.c
or ata-quirks.c or whatever name you like) containing ata_device_blacklist[].

This would require slight modification of ide_in_drive_list() to teach
it about ATA_HORKAGE_DMA but as I see from this patch this shouldn't be
a problem for you. ;)  Please also note that <linux/ata.h> is used by both
IDE and libata so it should be a good place to put struct ata_blacklist_entry
and ATA_HORKAGE_* macros.

Care to respin both patches?

>  * I do not really know what I am doing in the mips area, but
>    that architecture specific table seems to be used by the same
>    ide_in_drive_list() function, so the entries are matched to
>    the updated code.

Yep, thanks for not breaking AMD Alchemy IDE suppport.

It looks like au1xxx_ide.h should really be in drivers/ide/mips because
it is only included from drivers/ide/mips/au1xxx_ide.c - could somebody
verify this and send me a patch?

Thanks,
Bart
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/