Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2

[Ingo Molnar]

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo: to make things easier, the _best_ split-up would be not "this is 
> the historical series of patches leading up to CFS v15" or something 
> like that, but it would be nice to get that final CFS version as a 
> series of patches that do some specific things rather than as one 
> final one. Is there any possibility that could happen?

sure enough, i'll work something sane out - i already have it partly 
split up. It will probably be something along the lines of: 'remove 
stuff that we can remove and still have functional scheduling' followed 
by an 'add minimal CFS patch' and then nicely split up 'CFS related 
add-ons' (like the task-stats accounting things, debugging, etc). Do you 
think i should try to split up the core CFS bits some more beyond this 
level? (that would be quite nontrivial i suspect)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/