Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Fri, 25 May 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
...
> 1. If this is a function _declaration_ (i.e. a prototype in some
> header or some .c file), then remove the NORET_TYPE macro. Also,
> if an ATTRIB_NORET or NORET_AND already exists then you're done.
> Else, introduce an ATTRIB_NORET after the arglist but before ;

actually, what i would be introducing in all cases is "__noreturn",
the short form currently defined in compiler-gcc.h.  and i would be
removing every instance of ATTRIB_NORET and its buddies.

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/