[PATCH] msi: Fix the ordering of msix irqs.

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Thu May 24 2007 - 17:09:49 EST


Yours looks more complete then my test patch so:

From: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Found what seems the problem with our vectors being listed backward. In
drivers/pci/msi.c we should be using list_add_tail rather than list_add to
preserve the ordering across various kernels. Please consider this for
inclusion.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 0e67723..d74975d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
msi_mask_bits_reg(pos, is_64bit_address(control)),
maskbits);
}
- list_add(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);
+ list_add_tail(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);

/* Configure MSI capability structure */
ret = arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, 1, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev,
entry->dev = dev;
entry->mask_base = base;

- list_add(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);
+ list_add_tail(&entry->list, &dev->msi_list);
}

ret = arch_setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/