Re: Ext3 vs NTFS performance

[Bodo Eggert]

Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007 10:46:10 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

>> Which means the right place to fix this is samba.  Samba just need
>> to intersept lseek and pread/pwrite to never allocate sparse files
>> but do the right thing instead.  Now what the right thing would probably
>> be a preallocate instead of writing zeroes, and we need to provide the
>> infrastructure for them to do it, which is in progress currently.
> 
> Why do preallocate and not just truncate the file?

If it's done by samba, it's racy. Only the kernel can reliably tell a
write-beyond-eof from a write-before-eof. Either it should unconditionally
turn these preallocation-writes into truncates, or have a flag which will
turn this feature on and which can be used to turn the lseek into a real
preallocation call.

I don't think unconditionally turning these writes into truncate would be
good, it would change the behaviour of dd bs=1 count=$(($n*$BLOCKSIZE+1)).
-- 
Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say:
17. dd if=/dev/null of=/vmunix

Friß, Spammer: Gy9b.pfols@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/