Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class(was: battery class)

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:39:40PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> > > secondary notion too, as that is common.  It would be generic.
> > >
> > > Or maybe I just didn't get the idea behind the "type" attribute :-)
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate if these were documented in the text file.
> >
> > I think I got the start point of confusion. It's indeed bad to call such
> > power supply type as AC. Maybe I should it rename to ADAPTER? Or WALL?
> 
>  or MAINS?

Philipp, much thanks! MAINS indeed feels perfect for that.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@xxxxxxx
backup email: ya-cbou@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/