Re: [PATCH] Rewrite the MAJOR() macro as a call to imajor().

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri May 04 2007 - 02:18:33 EST


On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:23:54 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Replace the MAJOR() macro invocation with a call to the inline
> imajor() routine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 6b5b642..08da15b 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ static inline int is_loop_device(struct file *file)
> {
> struct inode *i = file->f_mapping->host;
>
> - return i && S_ISBLK(i->i_mode) && MAJOR(i->i_rdev) == LOOP_MAJOR;
> + return i && S_ISBLK(i->i_mode) && imajor(i) == LOOP_MAJOR;
> }

there's no runtime change, and I count a couple hundred MAJORs in the tree.

I don't want to receive 200 one-line patches please. If you're going to
do this then please do decent-sized per-subsystem patches and see if you can
persuade the subsystem maintainers to take them directly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/