Re: Back to the future.

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > While that would certainly be nifty, I think we're arguably starting 
> > from the wrong point here. Why are we booting a kernel, trying to poke 
> > the hardware back into some sort of mock-quiescent state, freeing memory 
> > and then (finally) overwriting the entire contents of RAM rather than 
> > just doing all of this from the bootloader?

Doing it from the bootloader sounds attractive... but it is lot of
work. I'm essentially using linux as a bootloader.

Patch for grub welcome.

> Sure, you could make suspend generate a complete bootable kernel image
> containing all RAM.  Doesn't sound too hard to me.  You know, from over
> here on the sidelines.

Ah, so we have a volunteer :-).
							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/