Re: [PATCH 1/6] firewire: handling of cards, buses, nodes

[Pekka Enberg]

On 5/2/07, Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I looked around a bit with grep -R and a few search terms but didn't
> find something definite.  Is there any other user of a crc16_itu_t or
> crc_ccitt or whatever which operates on a (CPU byte ordered) u32[]
> instead of on a (network byte ordered) u8[]?

I was referring to this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/12/137

On 5/2/07, Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The only value in having a shared implementation would be a potentially
> smaller kernel.  Sharing it to ensure correctness is not an issue;
> fw-topology.c::crc16_itu_t is simply the one in IEEE 1212 table 5.
> Performance is also not an issue (if better algorithms exist) because
> the FireWire stack uses it only infrequently on a moderate amount of data.

Yeah, it's not a biggie, but we do have a tradition of putting
generally useful things into lib/ so that everyone doesn't invent
their own.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/