Re: Kernel Scalability

[l . genoni]

On Wed, 2 May 2007, Daniel J Blueman wrote:

> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:43:44 +0100
> From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Rajib Majumder <rajibm2005@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Kernel Scalability
> Resent-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:44:58 +0200
> Resent-From: <l.genoni@xxxxxx>
>
> On 2 May, 14:00, "Rajib Majumder" <rajibm2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
> > 8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
> > 2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond 4-CPU?
> >
> > If yes, is the scalablity is near linear?
> >
> > Any input is appreciated.
>
> There are 128-processor IA64 systems which run recent 2.6 kernels out
> there; the per-processor counters, RCU and page-fault scalability work
> has been instrumental to the necessary scaling for decent resource
> usage on these.
>
> IIRC, there were some patches being developed to improve pagecache
> scalability lately too, but I guess it all depends on what kind of
> workload you have...
To stay on systems probably more familiar to the user who asked this 
question, there are also some 64 core X86_64 bot AMD and Intel out there, 
here the 2.6 kernel is doing 
very well even on those intel CPU with shared L2 cache.
I have some 16 and 32 core Opteron and never had scalability problems.
You have to pay a lot of attention to your kernel configuration  (100 HZ, 
just BKL preemption), and to the 
filesystems you decide to use.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/