Re: [patch 14/22] pollfs: pollable futex

[Davide Libenzi]

On Wed, 2 May 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> > It simple as is, there is no need to overdesign.
> 
> There is no reason to go with a limited, too-simple minded design if
> we've already identified a much better design.  The fact that poll is
> used today does not excuse piling on more and more code which makes
> additional functions which don't fit into the poll framework barely
> work.  Plus, poll/epoll itself is a problem.

Is it? Please do tell me more...


- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/