[GFS2] Fix a bug on i386 due to evaluation order [6/34]

From: Steven Whitehouse
Date: Tue May 01 2007 - 06:07:51 EST


>From 420d2a1028b906f24e836e37089a6ad55ab1848f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:05:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [GFS2] Fix a bug on i386 due to evaluation order

Since gcc didn't evaluate the last two terms of the expression in
glock.c:1881 as a constant expression, it resulted in an error on
i386 due to the lack of a 64bit divide instruction. This adds some
brackets to fix the problem.

This was reported by Andrew Morton.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index e707594..b8aa816 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ static int dump_glock(struct glock_iter *gi, struct gfs2_glock *gl)
if (test_bit(GLF_DEMOTE, &gl->gl_flags)) {
print_dbg(gi, " Demotion req to state %u (%llu uS ago)\n",
gl->gl_demote_state,
- (u64)(jiffies - gl->gl_demote_time)*1000000/HZ);
+ (u64)(jiffies - gl->gl_demote_time)*(1000000/HZ));
}
if (gl->gl_ops == &gfs2_inode_glops && gl->gl_object) {
if (!test_bit(GLF_LOCK, &gl->gl_flags) &&
--
1.5.1.2



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/