Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]

[Pekka Enberg]

On 4/15/07, hui Bill Huey <billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The perception here is that there is that there is this expectation that
> sections of the Linux kernel are intentionally "churn squated" to prevent
> any other ideas from creeping in other than of the owner of that subsytem

Strangely enough, my perception is that Ingo is simply trying to
address the issues Mike's testing discovered in RDSL and SD. It's not
surprising Ingo made it a separate patch set as Con has repeatedly
stated that the "problems" are in fact by design and won't be fixed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/