Re: [patch 2.6.21-rc5-git] make /proc/acpi/wakeup more useful

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > Are you _sure_ you have a 1-to-1 relationship here?  No multiple devices
> > pointing to the same acpi node?  Or the other way around?  If so, you
> > are going to have to change the name to be something more unique.
> 
> I've wondered that too.  The short answer:  APCI only supports 1-1
> here.  It will emit warnings if it tries to bind more than one ACPI
...
> Assuming they all adopt that same "parallel tree" model, that seems
> like a good idea.  The tools will likely need to understand how ACPI
> and OF differ, but there's no point in reserving more names than we
> really need.  Though it may be that "parallel trees" should go away.

If mapping is indeed 1-to-1 in acpi... it would be nice to just merge
the trees.
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/