RE: sched_yield proposals/rationale

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:15 -0400, Buytaert_Steven@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > > Agreed, but $ find . -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep -E "yield[ ]*\(" | wc
> > over
> > > the 2.6.16 kernel yields 105 hits, note including comments... An
> > interesting spot is e.g. fs/buffer.c free_more_memory()
> > 
> > A lot of those are probably broken in some way agreed.
> 
> OK, so there are 2 options: 1) fix 100 spots or 2) ... ;-)

100, simply because at least 95 of them are broken.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/