Re: If not readdir() then what?

[JÃrn Engel]

On Sun, 8 April 2007 21:44:26 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> 
> Well, Joern thought that rm -rf might relying on the telldir cookie
> being valid in precisely that circumstance.  If that is true, I'd
> argue that this is a BUG in GNU coreutils that should be fixed...

I heard it and accepted that claim without checking it.  Might have been
a mistake.  But the claim came from an NFS developer, which may explain
a thing or two.

NFS clients have to deal with a server rebooting underneith them and
should still behave as expected.  An "rm -r" running on the client
concurrently to a rebooting server is a problem indeed and could be
solved with seekdir/telldir.

That surely doesn't make life any easier for filesystem developers, I
agree.  From that point of view, all telldir cookies should end their
life at closedir time.  For "rm -r" it would be sufficient if the nfs
client simply didn't seekdir at all.  For "ls -lR", this would return
duplicate dentries.

JÃrn

-- 
My second remark is that our intellectual powers are rather geared to
master static relations and that our powers to visualize processes
evolving in time are relatively poorly developed.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/