Re: If not readdir() then what?

[Theodore Tso]

On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:41:30PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> 
> Garbage-collecting them on closedir() does not work.  It surprised me as
> well, but there seem to be applications that keep the telldir() cookie
> around after closedir().  Iirc, "rm -r" was one of them.
> 
> Neil, is this correct?

Well, according to the Single Unix Specification:

    If the value of loc was not obtained from an earlier call to
    telldir(), or if a call to rewinddir() occurred between the call
    to telldir() and the call to seekdir(), the results of subsequent
    calls to readdir() are unspecified.

It doesn't state explicitly that you can use the telldir cookie()
after closing the directory stream using closedir() and then reopening
it using opendir(), but given that it states that results are
undefined after a rewinddir() --- which is much less violent than a
closedir()/opendir(), I would definitely argue that an application
programmer would be very ill-advised to rely on this working.

(Of course, I'd argue that an application programmer shouldn't use
telldir/seekdir at all.....)

Ulrich, is it too late to insert a clarification that the telldir()
cookie isn't guaranteed to be valid after closedir() *or* rewinddir()?

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/