Re: [patch] remove artificial software max_loop limit

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sat Mar 31 2007 - 13:42:30 EST


On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:07:43 -0700 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 02:15:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 02:25:37 -0700
> > "Ken Chen" <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > -module_param(max_loop, int, 0);
> > > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_loop, "Maximum number of loop devices (1-256)");
> >
> > So.. this change will cause a fatal error for anyone who is presently
> > using max_loop, won't it? If they're doing that within their
> > initramfs/initrd/etc then things could get rather ugly for them.
> >
> > I don't know how much of a problem this will be in practice - do people use
> > max_loop much?
>
> Yes, the distros do, and they recommend it to their users a lot.

Thanks. In that case I think we should retain the max_loop module parameter
for now.

Ken, when you respin that patch could you restore max_loop, and make its
use trigger a warning along the lines of "loop: the max_loop option is obsolete
and will be removed in March 2008"?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/