Re: [BUG] scheduler: strange behavor with massiveinteractive processes

[Mike Galbraith]

On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 19:15 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:

> It seems to highly depend on # of processes and at present, Ingo's patch
> looks better.

Yeah, Ingo's patch forces the array switch where I try to avoid it if at
all possible.  I'm looking ways to know for sure that you just have to
bite that bullet.

Thanks for testing.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/