Re: [patch resend v4] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write

[Nick Piggin]

linux@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > But if you didn't notice until now, then the current implementation
> > must be pretty reasonable for you use as well.
>
>
> Oh, I definitely noticed.  As soon as I tried to port my application
> to 2.6, it broke - as evidenced by my complaints last year.  The
> current solution is simple - since it's running on dedicated boxes,
> leave them on 2.4.

Well I didn't know that was a change in behaviour vs 2.4 (or maybe I
did and forgot). That was probably a bit silly, unless there was a
good reason for it.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/