Re: [PATCH] Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation

[Andi Kleen]

On Wednesday 28 March 2007 21:18, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 March 2007 00:13, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >   
> >> smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete
> >> duplicates of the same logic.  This patch combines them by
> >> implementing them in terms of the more general
> >> smp_call_function_mask().
> >>     
> >
> > I think I got those already.
> >   
> 
> OK.  Do you have smp_ops and machine_ops?

Not yet. Can you resend the current set?

> There's a doc update patch too:

Can you send that separately after i sync out please?

Thanks

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/