Re: [PATCH 1/21] MSI: Simplify BUG() handling in pci_disable_msi()

[Eric W. Biederman]

Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Although it might be nice to do a printk before BUG'ing, it's really not
> necessary, and it complicates the code.
>

Acked-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>  drivers/pci/msi.c |   19 ++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Index: msi-new/drivers/pci/msi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- msi-new.orig/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ msi-new/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -646,18 +646,15 @@ void pci_disable_msi(struct pci_dev* dev
>  	if (!entry || !entry->dev || entry->msi_attrib.type != PCI_CAP_ID_MSI) {
>  		return;
>  	}
> -	if (irq_has_action(dev->first_msi_irq)) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: %s: pci_disable_msi() called without "
> -		       "free_irq() on MSI irq %d\n",
> -		       pci_name(dev), dev->first_msi_irq);
> -		BUG_ON(irq_has_action(dev->first_msi_irq));
> -	} else {
> -		default_irq = entry->msi_attrib.default_irq;
> -		msi_free_irq(dev, dev->first_msi_irq);
>  
> -		/* Restore dev->irq to its default pin-assertion irq */
> -		dev->irq = default_irq;
> -	}
> +	BUG_ON(irq_has_action(dev->first_msi_irq));
> +
> +	default_irq = entry->msi_attrib.default_irq;
> +	msi_free_irq(dev, dev->first_msi_irq);
> +
> +	/* Restore dev->irq to its default pin-assertion irq */
> +	dev->irq = default_irq;
> +
>  	dev->first_msi_irq = 0;
>  }
>  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/