Re: HPA patches

From: Matthew Garrett
Date: Tue Mar 27 2007 - 20:16:44 EST


On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:08:52AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> ata3.01: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 234441648, hpa_sectors = 0
^
Does this just indicate the lack of an hpa? If so, the

/* if no hpa, both should be equal */

comment seems to be wrong (or, alternatively, it's the
ata_read_native_max_address_ext call that's failing and returning
garbage? I'll look into that)

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/