Re: [patch 1/3] fix illogical behavior in balance_dirty_pages()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 22:55 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This is a slightly different take on the fix for the deadlock in fuse
> with dirty balancing.  David Chinner convinced me, that per-bdi
> counters are too expensive, and that it's not worth trying to account
> the number of pages under writeback, as they will be limited by the
> queue anyway.
> 

Please have a look at this:
  http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/19/220


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/