Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/7] containers (V7): Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:43:48PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I'm unsure here, but this 'tsk->cpuset == cs' test feels fragile to me.
> 
> How about a bit earlier in attach_task(), right at the point we overwrite the
> victim tasks cpuset pointer, we decrement the count on the old cpuset, and if
> it went to zero, remember that we'll need to release it, once we've dropped
> some locks:

Looks neater. Will adopt this when I send the patch. Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/