Re: [patch] rfc: introduce /dev/hugetlb

[Ken Chen]

On 3/23/07, William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> Lack of compiletesting beyond x86-64 in all probability.
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:15:55PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Ok, this will go kablamo on Power then even if it compiles. I don't
> > consider it a fundamental problem though. For the purposes of an RFC, it's
> > grand and something that can be worked with.
>
> He needs to un-#ifdef the prototype (which he already does), but he
> needs to leave the definition under #ifdef while removing the static
> qualifier. A relatively minor fixup.

Yes, sorry about that for lack of access to non-x86-64 machines.  I
needed to move the function prototype to hugetlb.h and evidently
removed the #ifdef by mistake.  I'm not going to touch this in my next
clean up patch, instead I will just declare char specific
file_operations struct in hugetlbfs and then have char device
reference it.

But nevertheless, hugetlb_get_unmapped_area function prototype  better
be in a header file somewhere.

- Ken
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/