Re: [rfc][patch] queued spinlocks (i386)

[Ingo Molnar]

* Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Implement queued spinlocks for i386. [...]

isnt this patented by MS? (which might not worry you SuSE/Novell guys, 
but it might be a worry for the rest of the world ;-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/