Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpusets/sched_domain reconciliation

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:14:35 -0600
cpw@xxxxxxx (Cliff Wickman) wrote:

> This patch reconciles cpusets and sched_domains that get out of sync
> due to disabling and re-enabling of cpu's.

I get three-out-of-three rejects in cpuset.c.  I could fix them, but I
wouldn't be very confident that the result works at runtime.  2.6.20-rc6 was
a long time ago - please, always raise patches against the latest mainline
kernel (the daily git snapshot suffices).

Recursion is a big no-no in kernel.  Is there any way in which it can be
avoided?  Is Dinakar's implementation also recursive?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/