Re: [PATCH -mm 1/4] Blackfin: architecture update patch

[Wu, Bryan]

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:53 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:19:23 +0800
> "Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 1) Some issues are fixed according to LKML patch review.
> > 2) Remove not supported BF535 code
> > 3) Fixed some bugs from blackfin.uclinux.org SVN update
> > Here is the updated patch for 2.6.21-rc4-mm1
> 
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/cplbinit.h.rej
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h.rej
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/scatterlist.h.rej
> 
> This seems to be against a kernel which did not include
> blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch.  But 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 did
> include blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch, so I'm not sure
> what is going on here.
> 

Sorry for this mess up. you know, as
blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch was posted, it was
applied to our SVN tree. And I just merged these weeks SVN change to
this update patch. So this patch includes
blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch. 

Please hold on, after I fixed some issues according to Arnd and Paul's
latest review, a new update patch will be sent.

Sorry for send a all-in-one update patch. Arnd and Paul gave lots' of
good ideas about our last blackfin-arch.patch last time, and most of
their request are applied in this days. So if I split the all-in-one
update patch to small fix, there will be maybe 20 or 30 patches.

After this blackfin-arch-update.patch was merged to -mm, I will post
small fixed patches as Arnd's advise.

Thanks
-Bryan Wu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/