Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc4-mm1: freezing of processes broken

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:55:34 +0300 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/21, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:45:16 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 15:23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could the freezer code be trying to freeze the idle thread as a result?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes. remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch make idle threads
> > > > visible to for_each_process/do_each_thread. Note also that idle threads
> > > > have ->mm != NULL. freezer, oom_kill, move_task_off_dead_cpu, etc, should
> > > > not see idle threads, but they do now.
> > > 
> > > Well, I think this is a good enough reason for asking Andrew to drop this
> > > patch.
> > 
> > Or we change the freezer to skip pid==0 tasks.
> 
> I strongly disagree. In that case we should audit all users of for_each_process.
> Imho, this change is too dangerous. Actually, I personally think it is very good
> that idle threads are special and not visible, imho we should not change this.

OK, I'll tentatively drop remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch

> Btw. Rafael, Andrew, what about
> 
> 	[PATCH] Make XFS workqueues nonfreezable
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117270675922229
> 
> , don't you think this should go to 2.6.21 ?
> 

I've sent it to the XFS guys a couple of times, but their black hole is one
of the deeper ones.

David?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/