Re: [PATCH 00/22 take 3] UBI: Unsorted Block Images

[JÃrn Engel]

On Tue, 20 March 2007 01:42:46 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 17:32 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> > > > 4. JFFS2 has its own wear-leving scheme, as do several other
> > > >    filesystems, so they probably want to bypass this piece of the stack.
> > > 
> > > JFFS2 on top of UBI delegates the wear levelling to UBI, as JFFS2s own
> > > wear levelling sucks. 
> > 
> > Ok, fine. How about LogFS, then?
> 
> LogFS can easily leverage UBI's wear algorithm.

Ok, now we have reached the absurd.  UBI quite fundamentally cannot do
wear leveling as good as LogFS can.  Simply because UBI has zero
knowledge of the _contents_ of its blocks.  Knowing whether a block is
90% garbage or not makes a great difference.

Also LogFS currently requires erasesizes of 2^n.

Thomas, I can give you my opinion on this flamewar in private - after
you have cooled off.

JÃrn

-- 
When I am working on a problem I never think about beauty.  I think
only how to solve the problem.  But when I have finished, if the
solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.
-- R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/