Re: [PATCH] kthread_should_stop_check_freeze (was: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/7] Freezer: Remove PF_NOFREEZE from rcutorture thread)

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Tue Mar 20 2007 - 14:10:40 EST


On Mon 2007-03-12 17:58:05, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > Looks good to me! The other kthread_should_stop() calls in
> > > > > rcutorture.c should also become
> > > > > kthread_should_top_check_freeze().
> >
> > > > Why is it useful?
> > >
> > > Because we want to avoid repeating
> > >
> > > while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> > > try_to_freeze();
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> > > in many places?
> >
> > Do not do it, then. Confusion it causes is not worth saving one line
> > of code.
> >
> > You do less typing, but the resulting code is _less_ readable, not
> > more.
> >
> > NAK.
>
> Another problem is people doing "kthread_should_stop()" and forgetting
> about freezing. Then we continue ending up with situations where weare
> intermittently unable to freeze. In the spirit of "Rusty Scale" interface

No, in such case we end up with situation when it is impossible to
freeze, and that's very easy to debug.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/