Re: [PATCH] slab: deal with NULL pointers passed to kmem_cache_free

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue Mar 20 2007 - 03:41:19 EST


Pekka Enberg a écrit :
On 3/19/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is a super-hot path.

Super-hot exactly where?

Don't be silly Pekka ... We have plenty oprofiles results if you dont trust Andrew.

CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 1992.52 MHz (estimated)
Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
samples % symbol name
1861563 4.7882 tg3_start_xmit_dma_bug
1375727 3.5386 memcpy_c
1166438 3.0002 tcp_v4_rcv
1157334 2.9768 kmem_cache_free

In this workload (real server), you can see kmem_cache_free() is number four.

Adding one test and conditional branch in this super-hot function just to correct a bug in a SCSI driver (or whatever) is not *SANE*.


Numbers talk.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/