Re: RSDL v0.31

[Gene Heskett]

On Saturday 17 March 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:26 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
>> RSDL appears to be completely deterministic, which is a very strong
>> virtue.
>
>Yes.  That's why RSDL aroused my curiosity big time.
>
>> The X people have plans for how to go about fixing this, but until
>> then, there's no reason to hold up kernel development.
>
>I'm not in a position to hold up development.
>
>On a side note, I wonder how long it's going to take to fix all the
>X/client combinations out there.

And on yet another side note Mike, I just did a make -j8 for all make 
options in my makeit script, something I don't normally do, and while 
running 2.6.20.3-rdsl-0.31, building 2.6.21-rc4, the machine remained 
100% responsive, worst case keyboard lag that I observed might have been 
200 or 300 milliseconds.  The machine remained usable, which to me is the 
bottom line.  And no, I wasn't running xmms at the time or watching 
tvtime else I'd have awakened the missus.

I'm having a hard time justifying your continual fussing as its obviously 
a huge improvement to me.  What makes your system and loading so much 
different from mine I wonder...

In the meantime I'm a very happy camper about this patch.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
		-- Alexandre Dumas, fils
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/