Re: [RFC] A need for "yesno"-function? (and "cleanup" of kernel.h)

[Bernd Petrovitsch]

On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 18:09 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 16:24 +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> > [...]
> >   
> >> more readable). The big problem is, where to put it? Seems wrong to put 
> >> in <linux/string.h> since it appear to be a replica of userspace's 
> >> <string.h> (otherwise, why put mem*-functions in there?).
> >>     
> >
> > memcpy(3) and memcmp(3) are also there in user-space.
> >   
> Did I miss something or did you just restate what was stated? (If it was 
> not a replica, I think the mem*-functions would be better placed in 
> memory.h, or such)

Ah,  I misunderstood it as if you wonder why mem*() functions in
<string.h>.
Sorry.

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/